Cognitive Psychology of Activity: Attention as a Constructive Process

  • Maria Falikman Lomonosov Moscow State University
  • Alexander Asmolov Lomonosov Moscow State University

Résumé

The problem of consciousness is one of the core problems in the contemporary cognitive science. Driven by the neuroimaging boom, most researchers look for the neural correlates or signatures of consciousness and awareness in the human brain. However, we believe that the explanatory potential of the cultural-historical activity approach to this problem is far from being exhausted. We propose Cognitive Psychology of Activity research program, or the activity theory-based constructivism as an attempt to account for multiple phenomena of human awareness and attention. This approach relies upon cultural-historical psychology and the concept of mediation by Lev S. Vygotsky, activity theory and the concept of image generation by Alexey N. Leontiev, the physiology of activity and the metaphor of movement construction by Nikolai A. Bernstein, transferred to the psychology of perception as image construction by a number of Russian researchers in 1960-es, and the understanding of attention as action by evolutionary cognitive psychologists of 1980-es. The central concept of our approach is a concept of task, defined by Leontiev as “a goal assigned in specific circumstances”. The goal determines choice and use of available cultural means (“mediators”) consistent with the circumstances or conditions of task performance, which in turn provide for the construction of processing
units allowing for more successful (“attentive”) performance and for the awareness of visual stimuli which could otherwise be missed or ignored. The perceptual task accomplishment is controlled at several levels organized heterarchically, with possible strategic reorganizations of this system demonstrating the constructive nature of human cognition.

Références

Allport, D. A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological con siderations of attention and action. Perspectives on perception and action, 15, 395–419.
Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1998). Radical constructivism and cognitive psychology. In D. Revitch (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy (pp. 227–278). Washington DC: JSTOR.
Asmolov, A. G. (1998). Historical evolutionary approach: Introductory notes. In A. G. Asmolov (Ed.), Vygotsky today: On the verge of non-classical psychology (pp. xix–xxix). New
York: Nova Publishers.
Asmolov, A. G., Shekhter, E. D., & Chernorizov, A. M. (2016). What is life from the psychological point of view: A historical evolutionary approach to the psychophysical
problem. Voprosy psikhologii., 2, 3-23.
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C. (1933). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 3(2), 187–192.
Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The co-ordination and regulation of movements. New York: Pergamon Press Ltd.
Burtt, H. E. (1917). Professor munsterberg’s vocational tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1(3), 201.
Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11(41), 63–65.
Cole, M., & Packer, M. (2015). A bio-cultural-historical approach to the study of development. In M. J. Gelfand, C.-Y. Chiu, & Y.-Y. Hong (Eds.), Handbook of advances in culture and psychology (Vol. 6). London: Oxford University Press.
Elliot, A. J., & Fryer, J. W. (2008). The goal construct in psychology. In J. Shah & W. Gardner(Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (Vol. 18, pp. 235–250). New York: Guilford Press.
Falikman, M. V. (2002). Word preference effect and the attentional blink: Who will have the upper hand? In E. V. der Meer (Ed.), Proceedings of the forty-third kongress der deutschen gesellschaft fuer psychologie (p. 324). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers. S.
Falikman, M. V. (2008). On the linguistic mediation of visual attention. ISCAR, Ecologies of Diversities: The Developmental and Historical Interarticulation of Human Mediational Forms. Book of Abstracts., 62.
Falikman, M. V. (2011). Word superiority effects across the varieties of attention. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 49(5), 45–61.
Falikman, M. V. (2014a). Attention and chunking in visual search among letter stimuli. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 11(2), 150–159.
Falikman, M. V. (2014b). Cognition and its master: New challenges to cognitive science. In Cambridge handbook of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 474–487). Cambridge University Press.
Falikman, M. V., & Stepanov, V. (2012). Chunking in rapid serial visual presentation: Consequences for visual awareness. Neuroscience and cognition: Consciousness and cognitive control, 33–34.
Fernandez-Duque, D., & Johnson, M. L. (2002). Cause and effect theories of attention: The role of conceptual metaphors. Review of general psychology, 6(2), 153–165.
Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.
Gippenreiter, Y. B., & Romanov, V. Y. (1972). A method of investigation of the internal form of visual activity. In R. MacLeod & H. L. Pick (Eds.), Perception: Essays in honor of James J. Gibson. New York: Cornell University Press.
Gorbunova, E., & Falikman, M. (2010). Word superiority within the attentional blink. Journal of Vision, 10(7), 203.
Gorbunova, E., & Falikman, M. (2011). Is word superiority effect the same for attended and inattended words? Perception ECVP abstract, 40(12).
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology new york, vol 1. New York: Henry Holt.
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. Vol I, II. New York: Norton.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain. New York: Basic Books.
Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge. a new look at the biological basis of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala/New Science Library.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. an account of basic findings. Psychological review, 88(5), 107–375.
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Neumann, O., Heijden, A. H. C., & Allport, D. A. (1986). Visual selective attention: Introductory remarks. Psychological Research, 48(4), 185–188.
O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and brain sciences, 24(5), 939–973.
Pashler, H. E., & Sutherland, S. (1998). The psychology of attention (Vol. 15). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Petrenko, V. F., & Suprun, A. P. (2015). Methodology of psychosemantics in the context of the philosophy of postnonclassical rationality and quantum physics. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 85(5), 434–442.
Raskin, J. D. (2002). Constructivism in psychology: Personal construct psychology, radical constructivism, and social constructionism. In J. Raskin & S. Bridges (Eds.), Studies in meaning: Exploring constructivist psychology (pp. 1–25). New York: Pace University Press.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an rsvp task: An attentional blink? Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 18(3), 849.
Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of experimental psychology, 81(2), 275–280.
Sinitsyna, M. (2009). Top-down influences upon visual information processing under metacontrast masking. Master’s Thesis. Supervised by Dr. M. Falikman. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Velichkovsky, B. M. (2002). Heterarchy of cognition: The depths and the highs of a framework for memory research. Memory, 10(5-6), 405–419.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University press.
Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1(1), 59–85.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 9(4), 625–636.
Wundt, W. (1896). An introduction to psychology. New York: Arno Press.
Yazykov, S., & Falikman, M. (2016). Eye movements in spontaneous and controlled word detection in letter arrays. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 13(2), 410–420.
Zaporozhets, A. V. (2002). Perception, movement, and action. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 40(4), 53–93.
Zinchenko, V. P. (1966). Perception as action in perception and action. In Proceedings of the 18th international congress of psychology. Moscow.
Zinchenko, V. P., & Vergiles, N. Y. (1972). Formation of visual images. New York: Springer.
Publiée
2017-09-21
Comment citer
FALIKMAN, Maria; ASMOLOV, Alexander. Cognitive Psychology of Activity: Attention as a Constructive Process. Revue internationale du CRIRES : innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 54-62, sep. 2017. ISSN 2291-6717. Disponible à l'adresse : >http://ojs.crires.ulaval.ca/index.php/ric/article/view/32>. Date de consultation : 23 nov. 2017