Lev Vygotsky’s Principle “One Step in Learning Represents a Hundred Steps in Development”: From Idea to Practice

  • Viktor K. Zaretskii Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Résumé

The article reviews Lev Vygotsky’s published works to trace the evolution of his understanding of child development. The authors believe that his assumption that one step in learning may mean one hundred steps in development, is as important as the two other keys postulate of the cultural-historical theory: the principle that learning precedes development and the concept of zone of proximal development. The authors provide a rational for utilization of these assumptions in the practice of development-facilitating psychological and educational assistance. A mechanism of this learning-development relationship is hypothesized. The article outlines a multidimensional model of the zone of proximal development illustrating the above mechanism. This model is one of the conceptual tools of the Reflection and Activity Approach helping children overcome learning difficulties and promoting their development. Having given the account of how they proceeded “from the idea to the problem” and “from the idea to the mechanism”, the authors provide case studies showing how this mechanism allows working with learning difficulties to trigger simultaneous improvement in multiple developmental dimensions. The article reports on the experience of running special Summer Schools for children with learning difficulties, implementing the “Chess for General Development” Project, and assisting orphaned children with severe somatic conditions. A case study of a female college student displaying signs of the learned helplessness syndrome is presented. The authors infer that Vygotsky’s idea of a specific relationship between learning and development may be of fundamental theoretical and practical value, especially for working with children with special needs. 

Références

Akhutina, T. V., & Pylaeva, N. M. (2008). Preodolenije trudnostei ucheniya: neiropsikhologicheskii podkhod [Overcoming educational difficulties: neuropsychological approach]. Saint Petersburg: Peter.
Alekseev, N. G. (1979). Metodologicheskie printsipy analiza kontseptual’nykh skhem deiatel’nosti v psikhologii [Methodological principles of analyzing conceptual schemata of activity in psychology]. Problemy metodologii v ergonomike [Methodological issues in Ergonomics](17), 104–125.
Alekseev, N. G. (1990). Shakhmaty I razvitije myshlenija [Chess and cognitive development]. Moscow: Vyschaya Schkola.
Bandura, A. A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
Belopol’skaya, N. L. (1997). Otsenka kognitivnykh i emotsional’nykh komponentov zony blizhaishego razvitiya u detei s zaderzhkoi psikhicheskogo razvitiya [Assessing cognitive and emotional components of zone of proximal development in children with impaired mental function]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of psychology], 4(1), 19-25.
Borozdin, A. I. (2000). The problem of activity in psychology. In L. I. Borovikov (Ed.), Uroki muzykalnoi terapii v shkole borozdina [Music therapy lessons in Borozdin’s school] (p. 245). Novosibirsk: Isdatel’stvo NIPKiPRO.
Daniels, H., Cole, M., & Wersch, J. V. (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davydov, V. V. (1996). Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya [The theory of developmental education]. Moscow: INTOR.
El’konin, D. B. (2008). Detskaya psikhologiya [Child psychology]. Moscow: Moskovskii tsentr "Akademiya".
El’konin, D. B. (2015). Pedagogicheskaya ideya razvivayushchego obucheniya [Pedagogical idea of developing training]. Sovremennost’ i vozrast [Modernity and age]., 26–28.
Etkind, A. M. (1987). Psikhologiya prakticheskaya i akademicheskaya: raskhozhdeniya kognitivnykh struktur vnutri professional’nogo soznaniya [Practical and academic psychology: differences of cognitive structures within professional frame of reference]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of psychology](6), 20–30.
Galperin, P. Y. (1998). Obucheniye i umstvennoje razvitije v detskom vozraste [learning and intellectual development in childhood]. In Psikhologija kak objektivnaja nauka [Psychology as objective science] (pp. 357–388). Moscow, Isdatel’stvo “Institut Prakticheskoy Psikhologii”: Voronezh, NPO “MODEK”.
Glozman, Z. M., & Soboleva, A. E. (2016). Kompleksnaja korrektsija trudnostej obuchenija v shkole [Integrative remediation of learning difficulties in school]. Moscow: Smysl.
Gordon, M. M. (1996). Opyt pervoj letnej shkoly dl’a detej s osobennostjami razvitija [First summer school for children with special needs]. In Podkhody k reabilitacii detej s osobennostjami razvitija sredstvami obrazovanija. Sb. nauchnyh trudov i proektnyh materialov. [Approaches to rehabilitation of children with special needs by means of education] (pp. 391–402). Moscow: Institut pedagogicheskih innovacij RAO.
Grinshpun, I. B. (2015). Istorija psikhoterapii. Lektsija 1. Vvedenie v istoriju psikhoterapii [History of psychotherapy. Lecture 1. Introduction to the history of psychotherapy]. Konsul’tativnaja psikhologija i psikhoterapija. [Counselling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 23(2), 175–207.
Kholmogorova, A. B. (2015). Rol’ idei L. S. Vygotskogo dlya stanovleniya paradigmy sotsial’nogo poznaniya v sovremennoi psikhologii: obzor zarubezhnykh issledovanii i obsuzhdenie perspektiv [The role of L. S. Vygotsky’s paradigm for the development of social cognition in modern psychology: a review of foreign studies and discussion of prospects]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-historical psychology], 11(3), 25–43. doi: 10.17759/chp.2015110304
Kholmogorova, A. B., & Zaretskii, V. K. (2011). Mozhet li kul’turno-istoricheskaya kontseptsiya L. S. Vygotskogo pomoch’ nam luchshe ponyat’, chto my delaem kak psikhoterapevty [Can the cultural-historical psychology of Vygotsky help us better understand what we are doing as psychotherapists]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-historical psychology](1), 108–118.
Kolomeitsev, P., & Manske, C. (2015). Kazhdii rebionok osobennii. illyuziya defekta [Every child is exceptional. Illusion of a deficit]. Moscow: Nikeya.
Korobeinikov, I. A. (2001). Narusheniya razvitiya i sotsial’naya adaptatsiya [Developmental disorders and social adjustment]. Moscow: PER SE.
Kravtsova, E. E. (2013). Kul’turnoistoricheskie osnovy zony blizhaishego razvitiya [Cultural-historical foundations of the zone of proximal development]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychology Journal], 22(4), 42–50.
Lebedev, V. A. (1996). Vspyshki v prostranstve zhizni [Flares in the space of life]. In Podkhody k reabilitacii detej s osobennostjami razvitija sredstvami obrazovanija. Sb. nauchnyh trudov i proektnyh materialov [Approaches to rehabilitation of children with special needs by means of education] (pp. 382–391). Moscow: Institut pedagogicheskih innovacij RAO.
Leont’ev, A. A. (1990). L. S. Vygotskii [L. S. Vygotsky]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.
Manske, C. (2014). Ucheniye kak otkrytije [Learning as discovery]. Moscow: Smysl.
Meshcheryakov, B. G. (2008). Vzglyady Vygotskogo na nauku o detskom razvitii [Vygotsky’s views on the science of child development]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural- historical psychology](3), 103–112.
Morozov, S. M. (2002). Dialektika Vygotskogo: vnechuvstvennaya real’nost’ deyatel’nosti [Vygotsky’s dialectic: the reality of extrasensory activity]. Moscow: Smysl.
Obukhova, L. F. (1995). Detskaya psikhologiya: teoriya, fakty, problem [Child psychology: theories, facts, problems]. Moscow: Trivola.
Obukhova, L. F., & Korepanova, I. A. (2005). Prostranstvennovremennaya skhema zony blizhaishego razvitiya [Space-time diagram of the zone of proximal development]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of psychology](5), 13–26.
Razuvaev, J. S., & Zaretskii, V. K. (2004). Shakhmaty dlja obshchego razvitija [Chess for general development]. Moscow: Mir detstva.
Rubtsov, V. V. (2008). Sotsial’nogeneticheskaya psikhologiya razvivayushchego obrazovaniya: deyatel’nostnyi podkhod [Socialgenetic psychology of developing education: the activity approach]. Moscow: MGPPU.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1992). Power and powerlessness: Comments on “cognates of personal control”. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 119–120.
Tsukerman, G. A. (2006). Vzaimodeistvie rebenka i vzroslogo, tvoryashcheje zonu blizhaishego razvitiya [Child-adult interaction: The creation of zone of proximal development]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-historical psychology](4), 61–73.
van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: a quest for synthesis. USA: Blackwell.
Varshava, B. E., & Vygotsky, L. S. (1931). Psikhologicheskii slovar [Psychological dictionary]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoje Uchebno-pedagogicheskoje izdatel’stvo.
Veresov, N. N. (2015). Eksperimental’nogeneticheskii metod i psikhologiya soznaniya: v poiskakh utrachennogo (stat’ya vtoraya). [Experimental genetic method and psychology of consciousness: raiders of the lost (second article)]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-historical psychology], 11(1), 117–126.
Volikova, S. V., & Glukhova, O. V. (2012). Dinamika urovnja razvitija poznavatel’nyh processov uchenikov nachal’nyh klassov, uchastvujushchikh v proekte “Shakhmaty dlja obshchego razvitija” [Developmental dynamics of learning processes in primary school children participating in chess for general development project]. In I. G. Sukhin (Ed.), Aktual’nye problemy prepodavanija uchebnoj discipliny “Shakhmaty” v obshheobrazovatel’nyh shkolakh i detskikh sadakh rossii i drugikh stran mira: materialy mezhdunarodnoj
nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii: Sbornik tezisov dokladov [Contemporary issues of teaching chess in schools and nurseries in russia and world-wide: International conference book of abstracts] (pp. 27–31). Moscow: Satka.
Vygodskaya, G. L., & Lifanova, T. M. (1996). Lev Semenovich Vygotskii. Moscow: Smysl.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1982a). Istoricheskii smysl psikhologicheskogo krizisa [historical meaning of psychological crisis]. Voprosy teorii i istorii psikhologii [Questions of theory and
history of psychology]. In A. R. Luriya & M. G. Yaroshevsky (Eds.), Sobranie sochinenii v 6-ti tomakh [the collected works in 6 volumes] (pp. 291–436). Moscow: Pedagogika.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1982b). Myshlenie i rech’ [Thinking and speech], Vol. 2. Moscow: Pedagogika.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1982c). Soznanie kak problema psikhologii pove deniya [Consciousness as a problem for the psychology of behavior]. Pedagogika, 1, 78–98.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1983a). Istoriya razvitiya vysshikh psikhich eskikh funktsii [Genesis of higher mental functions]. In Sobranie sochinenii v 6-ti tomakh [The collected works in 6 volumes] V.3 (pp. 5–328). Moscow: Pedagogika.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1983b). K psikhologii i pedagogike detskoi defektivnosti [Psychology and pedagogy of children’s defectiveness]. In T. L. Vlasova (Ed.), Osnovy defektologii [Foundations of defectology]. sobranie sochinenii v 6-ti tomakh [the collected works in 6 volumes] (pp. 62–84). Moscow: Pedagogika.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1984). Problemy detskoi (vozrastnoi psikhologii) [problems of childhood (developmental) psychology]. In In sobranie sochinenii v 6-ti tomakh [The collected works in 6 volumes] V.3 (pp. 243–432). Moscow: Pedagogika.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [educational psychology]. Moscow: Pedagogika Press.
Zaretskii, V. K. (1989). Ergonomika v sisteme nauchnogo znaniya i inzhenernoi deyatel’nosti [Ergonomics in the system of scientific knowledge and engineering activities]. In Metodologicheskie problemy proektnoi deyatel’nosti v ergonomike [Methodological problems of design in ergonomics] (pp. 8–20). Moscow: VNIITE.
Zaretskii, V. K. (1998). Ob opyte refleksivnodeyatel’nostnogo podkhoda k organizatsii korrektsionnykh zanyatii po russkomu yazyku [Using reflection and activity approach for arrangement of remedial lessons in russian language]. In Metody i sredstva reabilitatsii detei s osobennostyami razvitiya i invalidnost’yu [methods and tools for rehabilitation of children with special needs and disabilities] (pp. 86–90). Moscow: IPI RAO.
Zaretskii, V. K. (2007a). O chem ne uspel napisat’ L. S.Vygotskii [What Vygotsky didn’t have time to write]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-historical psychology](3),96–104.
Zaretskii, V. K. (2007b). Pomoshch’ detyam s trudnostyami v obuchenii v opore na zonu blizhaishego razvitiya [Helping children with learning difficulties in relying on the zone of proximal development]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii “kul’turnoistoricheskaya psikhologiya: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya”. In Cultural-historical psychology: current situation and prospects of development. proceedings of the international conference (pp. 111–119). Moscow: OOO "ALVIAN".
Zaretskii, V. K. (2008). Evristicheskii potentsial ponyatiya "zona blizhaishego razvitiya" [Heuristic potential of the concept of the "zone of proximal development"]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of psychology](6), 13–25.
Zaretskii, V. K. (2009). Zone of proximal development: What Vygotsky didn’t have time to write. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 47(6), 70–93.
Zaretskii, V. K. (2012). Dumaya o Piotre Yakovleviche Gal’perine [Thinking about Piotr Yakovlevich Galperin]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-historical psychology](1), 73–85.
Zaretskii, V. K. (2013). Stanovlenie i sushchnost’ refleksivno deyatel’nostnogo podkhoda v okazanii konsul’tativnoi psikhologopedagogicheskoi pomoshchi [Development and nature of Reflection and Activity Approach to the provision of advisory psychological and educational assistance]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling
psychology and psychotherapy](2), 8–37.
Zaretskii, V. K. (2015). Teorema L. S. Vygotskogo «Odin shag v obuchenii — sto shagov v razvitii»: v poiskakh dokazatel’stva [L. S. Vygotsky’s Principle “one step in learning — a hundred steps in development”: In search of evidence]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 11(3), 44–63. doi:10.17759/chp.2015110305
Zaretskii, V. K., & Gilyazov, A. (2017). To development through chess: reflection and activity approach. The educator’s guide to teaching chess in primary school, volume 1. Moscow: Otto Reichl.
Zaretskii, V. K., & Gilyazov, A. M. (2016a). K razvitiju cherez shakhmati: refleksivnodejatel’nostnyj podkhod. metodicheskoe posobie po vedeniju zanjatij v nachal’noj shkole [To development through chess: Reflection and activity approach. Primary school teacher’s guide]. Moscow: Isdatel’stvo “Reichl”.
Zaretskii, V. K., & Gilyazov, A. M. (2016b). Shakhmaty dlja obshhego razvitija. Rabochaja tetrad’ dlja zanjatij shakhmatami [Chess for general development. Chess workbook]. Moscow: Isdatel’stvo “Reichl”.
Zaretskii, V. K., & Gordon, M. M. (2011). O vozmozhnosti individualizatsii obrazovatel’nogo protsessa na osnove refleksivno-deyatel’nostnogo podkhoda v inklyuzivnoi praktike [Possibility of individualization of the educational process on the basis of reflection and activity approach in the inclusive practice]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychology science and education](3), 19–26.
Zaretskii, V. K., Smirnova, N. S., Zaretskii, Y. V., Evlashkina, N. M., & Kholmogorova, A. B. (2011). Tri glavnye problemy podrostka s deviantnym povedeniem. Pochemu voznikayut?
Kak pomoch’? [Three major problems with adolescent deviant behavior. Why there? How to help?]. Moscow: Forum.
Zaretskii, V. K., & Zaretskii, Y. V. (2015). Sluchai Denisa G. [Case of Denis G.]. Zhurnal konsul’tativnoi psikhologii i psikhoterapii [Journal of counseling psychology and psychotherapy](2), 166–180.
Zaretskii, Y. V. (2013). Sub’ektnaya pozitsiya po otnosheniyu k uchebnoi deyatel’nosti kak resurs razvitiya i predmet issledovaniya [Sense of agency in relation to educational activities as developmental resource, and subject of study]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling psychology and psychotherapy], 110–128.
Zinchenko, V. P. (2011). Lev Semenovich Vygotskii: zhizn’ i deyatel’nost’ [L. S. Vygotsky: life and activity]. In T. G. Shchedrina (Ed.), Stil’ myshleniya: problema istoricheskogo edinstva nauchnogo znaniya. K 80-letiyu Vladimira Petrovicha Zinchenko. Kollektivnaya monografiya [way of thinking: the problem of the historical unity of scientific knowledge. V.P.
Zinchenko eightieth anniversary] (pp. 294–299). Moscow: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN).
Publiée
2017-09-21
Comment citer
ZARETSKII, Viktor K.. Lev Vygotsky’s Principle “One Step in Learning Represents a Hundred Steps in Development”: From Idea to Practice. Revue internationale du CRIRES : innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 97-133, sep. 2017. ISSN 2291-6717. Disponible à l'adresse : >http://ojs.crires.ulaval.ca/index.php/ric/article/view/36>. Date de consultation : 23 nov. 2017